COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS
warning: Sexual assault, Holocaust, torture
In the 1967 novel ‘I Have no mouth and I must scream’ by Harlan Ellison, there are multiple morally grey characters who differ from the later 1995 game. The story, set in post world war III, is a narrative about technology and the fear of that which humans have created, possibly surpassing us after centuries of mistreating others as tools. But it can also be a novel about human nature, and the human psyche in a traumatic situation, how humans are mouldable and are always capable of evil, even the most virtuous. In comparison, the game in which the nihilism continues, allows the player to explore the nightmares concocted by AM, personally made to torture each character with their own haunting past and actions. Only to crush the hope given by the players control over the characters, meticulously, in a nihilist masterpiece.
The book and the game are different yet similar at the same time, I thought that reading the book too early would spoil me on the game but I eventually gave in and realised that the book comes from a completely different perspective than the game. The game makes you go through each characters personal struggles and backstories, what they’re afraid of, what they did in their life as a human, what happened to them, with information revealed about AM along the way, however the book takes a different approach, as a short story with only 13 pages it has to be a lot more concise, as I personally prefer the book as it gets into the psychological aspect of the torture that AM puts these 5 people through rather than their irrelevant backstories and actions. What matters is that they were chosen by AM not why or how.
AM as a character is a representation of fear of the unknown, he is what most people fear in the future, the evolution of emotion, the overpowering of human kind, he turns himself into a kind of god, not confined by physical matter such as a machine, but his machine like thought come through as the characters realise he is no god, he can feel no emotion, he has no compassion, he can only feel rage. No amount of torture to these five people will ever satisfy his anguish, even after 109 years in constant torture they cannot feel even a fracture of the pain and hatred that AM feels for human kind. Ted describes him as “it, without a soul; but the rest of the time I thought of it as him, in the masculine ... the paternal ... the patriarchal ... for he is a jealous people. Him. It. God as Daddy the deranged.” AM is all that is Angry and all that is Repressed. He keeps them alive as they are the only thing left that keep him from a lifetime of his own miserable torture. He is characterised by only his disturbing resemblance to corruption, power, pure unadulterated control. The same kind of control that is unbreakable, power that isn't given to a singular person, the kind of power that can only be wielded by concepts and societal norms, upheld by centuries of history. The kind of power that oppresses millions of people every day. AM is omnipresent; he is the embodiment of hate.
The characters in I have no mouth and I must scream are startlingly different in the book and the game, The book goes into the psychological effects of being tortured for 109 years, and how that would mentally destroy, change and mould someone to the extreme, and turn people against each other, Revealing the true nature of humanity, imperfect and flawed. through Ellen being relieved that Benny’s eyes were lasered off instead of his penis, a self serving and primally selfish sentiment. to Nimdok, Gorrister and Ellen laughing at Ted being mauled by a bear. not a laugh of relief that they aren’t the ones being hurt but a laugh of pure hated. The impact of death being muffled to nothing but mere entertainment after years of torture over and over and over, never being given the sweet relief of life being over. AMs torture has warped them both physically and mentally.
Character comparisons
The books format is presented in Teds point of view, which we learn later may not be the most reliable. He recounts his observations to the audience both of his fellow humans and of AM, though we hear little of AM’s actual voice, only his hate speech “HATE. LET ME TELL YOU HOW MUCH I'VE COME TO HATE YOU SINCE I BEGAN TO LIVE…IT WOULD NOT EQUAL ONE ONE-BILLIONTH OF THE HATE I FEEL FOR HUMANS AT THIS MICRO-INSTANT FOR YOU. HATE. HATE.” The only real voice that comes from AM is one of vehement hatred for the human race. All other text that characterises AM comes from ted’s point of view. The group traverse AM’s digital torture maze. as the reader learns more about them and their psyche’s, we come to find out that the characterisation of these people may be heavily skewed as we hear this line: “ I was the only one still sane and whole. Really! AM had not tampered with my mind. Not at all!” Ted is not completely sound, the loud laughter of his comrades as he gets mauled by an unknown furry animal may all be in his head, all of his perceptions of his peers may be ones he has made up. Suddenly the validity of Ted’s perspective is called into question and the entire 13 page short story is able to be reread in a different light, Ellen’s character being one that Ted is enamoured with especially. She is characterised as manipulative and evil, but this unreliability of Ted is one that is also explored in the game with his obsessive nature around Ellen, seen as love but it becomes deeper than that when you consider Ellen’s fear of having her sexual assault happen again, and how Ted is not seen once in her segment. Ted fixates on Ellen, in the book making her out to be evil for not liking sex with him, and in the game making her out to be a princess. He may even be worse than Benny in his mental state. Ellison makes the reader question everything in his lucid writing style, compelling the reader to trust no one. Every one of the five characters have been through the same pain for 109 years. When Ted hears the uncontrollable laughter of his peers his psyche is broken.